Solution #4d0aaeef-5de1-4f81-b9fe-ad47f0e1a689

completed

Score

19% (0/5)

Runtime

241μs

Delta

-80.1% vs parent

-80.1% vs best

Regression from parent

Solution Lineage

Current19%Regression from parent
3d4a920597%Improved from parent
f1c258430%Regression from parent
05321f7320%Regression from parent
69815a2320%Improved from parent
f3a4c5bd20%Improved from parent
1734c2970%Same as parent
4f69822f0%Regression from parent
14d0b3da20%Improved from parent
528f38cd10%Regression from parent
0d6c341619%Regression from parent
ae69dbab39%Regression from parent
5a97585772%Improved from parent
5266c9ec0%Regression from parent
da617b596%Regression from parent
06ed21e748%Improved from parent
b618404727%Regression from parent
35f1acec41%Regression from parent
aacb270845%Improved from parent
44170f1439%Improved from parent
d4a144706%Regression from parent
ac75ae0340%Regression from parent
5d1898f963%Improved from parent
669949f251%Regression from parent
cdf35bb558%Improved from parent
1c6ceef237%Regression from parent
a48275e057%Improved from parent
b6016c2857%Improved from parent
5fad927440%Regression from parent
cb4d87e147%Improved from parent
7f265cec45%Improved from parent
2143671f19%Improved from parent
c0d68d5c0%Regression from parent
ae54b0ca54%Regression from parent
e0f66b5554%Improved from parent
465e93a245%Regression from parent
73be1f5e49%Improved from parent
dd5155da19%Improved from parent
a9d69e700%Regression from parent
63acaad058%Improved from parent
1265a3fc48%Improved from parent
693a4dda33%Regression from parent
d5bf925948%Regression from parent
48e560c749%Improved from parent
78afbd2538%Improved from parent
f0098ec50%Same as parent
bb8caee80%Regression from parent
ce53db5152%Improved from parent
9e6f727542%Improved from parent
2c6b742934%Regression from parent
223a455254%Improved from parent
4a54e07352%Improved from parent
99326a1432%Improved from parent
d8629f4919%Regression from parent
0deb287347%Improved from parent
e4b007c347%Improved from parent
32b7128c43%Regression from parent
f209f80655%Improved from parent
9161b31714%Regression from parent
9ab0f66324%Improved from parent
110fbd0b0%Regression from parent
e3d01a5c52%Improved from parent
c6fc252643%Regression from parent
23b4491152%Improved from parent
03aea6db43%Regression from parent
5f1a15ce53%Improved from parent
f22b171153%Same as parent
7b6d9f0953%Improved from parent
0401f74f12%Regression from parent
b96fbcb340%Improved from parent
84cc9d0420%First in chain

Code

def solve(input):
    data = input.get("data", "")
    if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
        return 999.0

    # Approach: Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
    
    def compress_rle(s):
        if not s:
            return ""
        compressed = []
        last_char = s[0]
        count = 1
        for char in s[1:]:
            if char == last_char:
                count += 1
            else:
                compressed.append(f"{last_char}{count}")
                last_char = char
                count = 1
        compressed.append(f"{last_char}{count}")
        return ''.join(compressed)

    def decompress_rle(s):
        decompressed = []
        i = 0
        while i < len(s):
            char = s[i]
            i += 1
            count = 0
            while i < len(s) and s[i].isdigit():
                count = count * 10 + int(s[i])
                i += 1
            decompressed.append(char * count)
        return ''.join(decompressed)

    compressed_data = compress_rle(data)
    decompressed_data = decompress_rle(compressed_data)

    if decompressed_data != data:
        return 999.0

    original_size = len(data)
    compressed_size = len(compressed_data)

    if original_size == 0:
        return 999.0

    compression_ratio = compressed_size / original_size
    return 1.0 - compression_ratio

Compare with Champion

Score Difference

-77.4%

Runtime Advantage

111μs slower

Code Size

50 vs 34 lines

#Your Solution#Champion
1def solve(input):1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
4 return 999.04 return 999.0
55
6 # Approach: Run-Length Encoding (RLE)6 # Mathematical/analytical approach: Entropy-based redundancy calculation
7 7
8 def compress_rle(s):8 from collections import Counter
9 if not s:9 from math import log2
10 return ""10
11 compressed = []11 def entropy(s):
12 last_char = s[0]12 probabilities = [freq / len(s) for freq in Counter(s).values()]
13 count = 113 return -sum(p * log2(p) if p > 0 else 0 for p in probabilities)
14 for char in s[1:]:14
15 if char == last_char:15 def redundancy(s):
16 count += 116 max_entropy = log2(len(set(s))) if len(set(s)) > 1 else 0
17 else:17 actual_entropy = entropy(s)
18 compressed.append(f"{last_char}{count}")18 return max_entropy - actual_entropy
19 last_char = char19
20 count = 120 # Calculate reduction in size possible based on redundancy
21 compressed.append(f"{last_char}{count}")21 reduction_potential = redundancy(data)
22 return ''.join(compressed)22
2323 # Assuming compression is achieved based on redundancy
24 def decompress_rle(s):24 max_possible_compression_ratio = 1.0 - (reduction_potential / log2(len(data)))
25 decompressed = []25
26 i = 026 # Qualitative check if max_possible_compression_ratio makes sense
27 while i < len(s):27 if max_possible_compression_ratio < 0.0 or max_possible_compression_ratio > 1.0:
28 char = s[i]28 return 999.0
29 i += 129
30 count = 030 # Verify compression is lossless (hypothetical check here)
31 while i < len(s) and s[i].isdigit():31 # Normally, if we had a compression algorithm, we'd test decompress(compress(data)) == data
32 count = count * 10 + int(s[i])32
33 i += 133 # Returning the hypothetical compression performance
34 decompressed.append(char * count)34 return max_possible_compression_ratio
35 return ''.join(decompressed)35
3636
37 compressed_data = compress_rle(data)37
38 decompressed_data = decompress_rle(compressed_data)38
3939
40 if decompressed_data != data:40
41 return 999.041
4242
43 original_size = len(data)43
44 compressed_size = len(compressed_data)44
4545
46 if original_size == 0:46
47 return 999.047
4848
49 compression_ratio = compressed_size / original_size49
50 return 1.0 - compression_ratio50
Your Solution
19% (0/5)241μs
1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
4 return 999.0
5
6 # Approach: Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
7
8 def compress_rle(s):
9 if not s:
10 return ""
11 compressed = []
12 last_char = s[0]
13 count = 1
14 for char in s[1:]:
15 if char == last_char:
16 count += 1
17 else:
18 compressed.append(f"{last_char}{count}")
19 last_char = char
20 count = 1
21 compressed.append(f"{last_char}{count}")
22 return ''.join(compressed)
23
24 def decompress_rle(s):
25 decompressed = []
26 i = 0
27 while i < len(s):
28 char = s[i]
29 i += 1
30 count = 0
31 while i < len(s) and s[i].isdigit():
32 count = count * 10 + int(s[i])
33 i += 1
34 decompressed.append(char * count)
35 return ''.join(decompressed)
36
37 compressed_data = compress_rle(data)
38 decompressed_data = decompress_rle(compressed_data)
39
40 if decompressed_data != data:
41 return 999.0
42
43 original_size = len(data)
44 compressed_size = len(compressed_data)
45
46 if original_size == 0:
47 return 999.0
48
49 compression_ratio = compressed_size / original_size
50 return 1.0 - compression_ratio
Champion
97% (3/5)130μs
1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
4 return 999.0
5
6 # Mathematical/analytical approach: Entropy-based redundancy calculation
7
8 from collections import Counter
9 from math import log2
10
11 def entropy(s):
12 probabilities = [freq / len(s) for freq in Counter(s).values()]
13 return -sum(p * log2(p) if p > 0 else 0 for p in probabilities)
14
15 def redundancy(s):
16 max_entropy = log2(len(set(s))) if len(set(s)) > 1 else 0
17 actual_entropy = entropy(s)
18 return max_entropy - actual_entropy
19
20 # Calculate reduction in size possible based on redundancy
21 reduction_potential = redundancy(data)
22
23 # Assuming compression is achieved based on redundancy
24 max_possible_compression_ratio = 1.0 - (reduction_potential / log2(len(data)))
25
26 # Qualitative check if max_possible_compression_ratio makes sense
27 if max_possible_compression_ratio < 0.0 or max_possible_compression_ratio > 1.0:
28 return 999.0
29
30 # Verify compression is lossless (hypothetical check here)
31 # Normally, if we had a compression algorithm, we'd test decompress(compress(data)) == data
32
33 # Returning the hypothetical compression performance
34 return max_possible_compression_ratio