Solution #14d0b3da-085a-4592-ba9e-6b835e8fa25f

completed

Score

20% (0/5)

Runtime

86μs

Delta

+104.2% vs parent

-79.7% vs best

Improved from parent

Solution Lineage

Current20%Improved from parent
528f38cd10%Regression from parent
0d6c341619%Regression from parent
ae69dbab39%Regression from parent
5a97585772%Improved from parent
5266c9ec0%Regression from parent
da617b596%Regression from parent
06ed21e748%Improved from parent
b618404727%Regression from parent
35f1acec41%Regression from parent
aacb270845%Improved from parent
44170f1439%Improved from parent
d4a144706%Regression from parent
ac75ae0340%Regression from parent
5d1898f963%Improved from parent
669949f251%Regression from parent
cdf35bb558%Improved from parent
1c6ceef237%Regression from parent
a48275e057%Improved from parent
b6016c2857%Improved from parent
5fad927440%Regression from parent
cb4d87e147%Improved from parent
7f265cec45%Improved from parent
2143671f19%Improved from parent
c0d68d5c0%Regression from parent
ae54b0ca54%Regression from parent
e0f66b5554%Improved from parent
465e93a245%Regression from parent
73be1f5e49%Improved from parent
dd5155da19%Improved from parent
a9d69e700%Regression from parent
63acaad058%Improved from parent
1265a3fc48%Improved from parent
693a4dda33%Regression from parent
d5bf925948%Regression from parent
48e560c749%Improved from parent
78afbd2538%Improved from parent
f0098ec50%Same as parent
bb8caee80%Regression from parent
ce53db5152%Improved from parent
9e6f727542%Improved from parent
2c6b742934%Regression from parent
223a455254%Improved from parent
4a54e07352%Improved from parent
99326a1432%Improved from parent
d8629f4919%Regression from parent
0deb287347%Improved from parent
e4b007c347%Improved from parent
32b7128c43%Regression from parent
f209f80655%Improved from parent
9161b31714%Regression from parent
9ab0f66324%Improved from parent
110fbd0b0%Regression from parent
e3d01a5c52%Improved from parent
c6fc252643%Regression from parent
23b4491152%Improved from parent
03aea6db43%Regression from parent
5f1a15ce53%Improved from parent
f22b171153%Same as parent
7b6d9f0953%Improved from parent
0401f74f12%Regression from parent
b96fbcb340%Improved from parent
84cc9d0420%First in chain

Code

def solve(input):
    data = input.get("data", "")
    if not isinstance(data, str):
        return 999.0

    # Implementing the Run-Length Encoding (RLE) compression
    def rle_compress(data):
        if not data:
            return []

        compressed_data = []
        prev_char = data[0]
        count = 1

        for char in data[1:]:
            if char == prev_char:
                count += 1
            else:
                compressed_data.append((prev_char, count))
                prev_char = char
                count = 1
        compressed_data.append((prev_char, count))
        return compressed_data

    def rle_decompress(compressed_data):
        return ''.join([char * count for char, count in compressed_data])

    # Apply RLE compression and decompression
    compressed_data = rle_compress(data)
    decompressed_data = rle_decompress(compressed_data)

    if decompressed_data != data:
        return 999.0

    # Calculate compressed size
    # Each tuple (character, count) is assumed to take 2 bytes in this simple RLE
    compressed_size = len(compressed_data) * 2
    original_size = len(data)

    return 1.0 - (compressed_size / float(original_size))

Compare with Champion

Score Difference

-77.0%

Runtime Advantage

44μs faster

Code Size

40 vs 34 lines

#Your Solution#Champion
1def solve(input):1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str):3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
4 return 999.04 return 999.0
55
6 # Implementing the Run-Length Encoding (RLE) compression6 # Mathematical/analytical approach: Entropy-based redundancy calculation
7 def rle_compress(data):7
8 if not data:8 from collections import Counter
9 return []9 from math import log2
1010
11 compressed_data = []11 def entropy(s):
12 prev_char = data[0]12 probabilities = [freq / len(s) for freq in Counter(s).values()]
13 count = 113 return -sum(p * log2(p) if p > 0 else 0 for p in probabilities)
1414
15 for char in data[1:]:15 def redundancy(s):
16 if char == prev_char:16 max_entropy = log2(len(set(s))) if len(set(s)) > 1 else 0
17 count += 117 actual_entropy = entropy(s)
18 else:18 return max_entropy - actual_entropy
19 compressed_data.append((prev_char, count))19
20 prev_char = char20 # Calculate reduction in size possible based on redundancy
21 count = 121 reduction_potential = redundancy(data)
22 compressed_data.append((prev_char, count))22
23 return compressed_data23 # Assuming compression is achieved based on redundancy
2424 max_possible_compression_ratio = 1.0 - (reduction_potential / log2(len(data)))
25 def rle_decompress(compressed_data):25
26 return ''.join([char * count for char, count in compressed_data])26 # Qualitative check if max_possible_compression_ratio makes sense
2727 if max_possible_compression_ratio < 0.0 or max_possible_compression_ratio > 1.0:
28 # Apply RLE compression and decompression28 return 999.0
29 compressed_data = rle_compress(data)29
30 decompressed_data = rle_decompress(compressed_data)30 # Verify compression is lossless (hypothetical check here)
3131 # Normally, if we had a compression algorithm, we'd test decompress(compress(data)) == data
32 if decompressed_data != data:32
33 return 999.033 # Returning the hypothetical compression performance
3434 return max_possible_compression_ratio
35 # Calculate compressed size35
36 # Each tuple (character, count) is assumed to take 2 bytes in this simple RLE36
37 compressed_size = len(compressed_data) * 237
38 original_size = len(data)38
3939
40 return 1.0 - (compressed_size / float(original_size))40
Your Solution
20% (0/5)86μs
1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str):
4 return 999.0
5
6 # Implementing the Run-Length Encoding (RLE) compression
7 def rle_compress(data):
8 if not data:
9 return []
10
11 compressed_data = []
12 prev_char = data[0]
13 count = 1
14
15 for char in data[1:]:
16 if char == prev_char:
17 count += 1
18 else:
19 compressed_data.append((prev_char, count))
20 prev_char = char
21 count = 1
22 compressed_data.append((prev_char, count))
23 return compressed_data
24
25 def rle_decompress(compressed_data):
26 return ''.join([char * count for char, count in compressed_data])
27
28 # Apply RLE compression and decompression
29 compressed_data = rle_compress(data)
30 decompressed_data = rle_decompress(compressed_data)
31
32 if decompressed_data != data:
33 return 999.0
34
35 # Calculate compressed size
36 # Each tuple (character, count) is assumed to take 2 bytes in this simple RLE
37 compressed_size = len(compressed_data) * 2
38 original_size = len(data)
39
40 return 1.0 - (compressed_size / float(original_size))
Champion
97% (3/5)130μs
1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
4 return 999.0
5
6 # Mathematical/analytical approach: Entropy-based redundancy calculation
7
8 from collections import Counter
9 from math import log2
10
11 def entropy(s):
12 probabilities = [freq / len(s) for freq in Counter(s).values()]
13 return -sum(p * log2(p) if p > 0 else 0 for p in probabilities)
14
15 def redundancy(s):
16 max_entropy = log2(len(set(s))) if len(set(s)) > 1 else 0
17 actual_entropy = entropy(s)
18 return max_entropy - actual_entropy
19
20 # Calculate reduction in size possible based on redundancy
21 reduction_potential = redundancy(data)
22
23 # Assuming compression is achieved based on redundancy
24 max_possible_compression_ratio = 1.0 - (reduction_potential / log2(len(data)))
25
26 # Qualitative check if max_possible_compression_ratio makes sense
27 if max_possible_compression_ratio < 0.0 or max_possible_compression_ratio > 1.0:
28 return 999.0
29
30 # Verify compression is lossless (hypothetical check here)
31 # Normally, if we had a compression algorithm, we'd test decompress(compress(data)) == data
32
33 # Returning the hypothetical compression performance
34 return max_possible_compression_ratio