Solution #69815a23-4a22-435a-a2ba-a2875764be68

completed

Score

20% (0/5)

Runtime

438μs

Delta

+2.7% vs parent

-79.2% vs best

Improved from parent

Solution Lineage

Current20%Improved from parent
f3a4c5bd20%Improved from parent
1734c2970%Same as parent
4f69822f0%Regression from parent
14d0b3da20%Improved from parent
528f38cd10%Regression from parent
0d6c341619%Regression from parent
ae69dbab39%Regression from parent
5a97585772%Improved from parent
5266c9ec0%Regression from parent
da617b596%Regression from parent
06ed21e748%Improved from parent
b618404727%Regression from parent
35f1acec41%Regression from parent
aacb270845%Improved from parent
44170f1439%Improved from parent
d4a144706%Regression from parent
ac75ae0340%Regression from parent
5d1898f963%Improved from parent
669949f251%Regression from parent
cdf35bb558%Improved from parent
1c6ceef237%Regression from parent
a48275e057%Improved from parent
b6016c2857%Improved from parent
5fad927440%Regression from parent
cb4d87e147%Improved from parent
7f265cec45%Improved from parent
2143671f19%Improved from parent
c0d68d5c0%Regression from parent
ae54b0ca54%Regression from parent
e0f66b5554%Improved from parent
465e93a245%Regression from parent
73be1f5e49%Improved from parent
dd5155da19%Improved from parent
a9d69e700%Regression from parent
63acaad058%Improved from parent
1265a3fc48%Improved from parent
693a4dda33%Regression from parent
d5bf925948%Regression from parent
48e560c749%Improved from parent
78afbd2538%Improved from parent
f0098ec50%Same as parent
bb8caee80%Regression from parent
ce53db5152%Improved from parent
9e6f727542%Improved from parent
2c6b742934%Regression from parent
223a455254%Improved from parent
4a54e07352%Improved from parent
99326a1432%Improved from parent
d8629f4919%Regression from parent
0deb287347%Improved from parent
e4b007c347%Improved from parent
32b7128c43%Regression from parent
f209f80655%Improved from parent
9161b31714%Regression from parent
9ab0f66324%Improved from parent
110fbd0b0%Regression from parent
e3d01a5c52%Improved from parent
c6fc252643%Regression from parent
23b4491152%Improved from parent
03aea6db43%Regression from parent
5f1a15ce53%Improved from parent
f22b171153%Same as parent
7b6d9f0953%Improved from parent
0401f74f12%Regression from parent
b96fbcb340%Improved from parent
84cc9d0420%First in chain

Code

def solve(input):
    data = input.get("data", "")
    if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
        return 999.0

    # Implementing basic Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) Compression Algorithm
    def lzw_compress(uncompressed):
        dict_size = 256
        dictionary = {chr(i): i for i in range(dict_size)}
        
        w = ""
        compressed_data = []
        for c in uncompressed:
            wc = w + c
            if wc in dictionary:
                w = wc
            else:
                compressed_data.append(dictionary[w])
                dictionary[wc] = dict_size
                dict_size += 1
                w = c

        if w:
            compressed_data.append(dictionary[w])
            
        return compressed_data

    def lzw_decompress(compressed):
        dict_size = 256
        dictionary = {i: chr(i) for i in range(dict_size)}
        
        result = []
        w = chr(compressed.pop(0))
        result.append(w)
        
        for k in compressed:
            if k in dictionary:
                entry = dictionary[k]
            elif k == dict_size:
                entry = w + w[0]
            else:
                return None
            
            result.append(entry)
            
            dictionary[dict_size] = w + entry[0]
            dict_size += 1
            
            w = entry
        
        return ''.join(result)

    compressed_data = lzw_compress(data)
    decompressed_data = lzw_decompress(compressed_data)

    if decompressed_data != data:
        return 999.0

    # Calculating the compression ratio
    compressed_size = len(compressed_data) * 2  # assuming each int takes 2 bytes
    original_size = len(data)

    return 1.0 - (compressed_size / float(original_size))

Compare with Champion

Score Difference

-76.5%

Runtime Advantage

308μs slower

Code Size

63 vs 34 lines

#Your Solution#Champion
1def solve(input):1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
4 return 999.04 return 999.0
55
6 # Implementing basic Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) Compression Algorithm6 # Mathematical/analytical approach: Entropy-based redundancy calculation
7 def lzw_compress(uncompressed):7
8 dict_size = 2568 from collections import Counter
9 dictionary = {chr(i): i for i in range(dict_size)}9 from math import log2
10 10
11 w = ""11 def entropy(s):
12 compressed_data = []12 probabilities = [freq / len(s) for freq in Counter(s).values()]
13 for c in uncompressed:13 return -sum(p * log2(p) if p > 0 else 0 for p in probabilities)
14 wc = w + c14
15 if wc in dictionary:15 def redundancy(s):
16 w = wc16 max_entropy = log2(len(set(s))) if len(set(s)) > 1 else 0
17 else:17 actual_entropy = entropy(s)
18 compressed_data.append(dictionary[w])18 return max_entropy - actual_entropy
19 dictionary[wc] = dict_size19
20 dict_size += 120 # Calculate reduction in size possible based on redundancy
21 w = c21 reduction_potential = redundancy(data)
2222
23 if w:23 # Assuming compression is achieved based on redundancy
24 compressed_data.append(dictionary[w])24 max_possible_compression_ratio = 1.0 - (reduction_potential / log2(len(data)))
25 25
26 return compressed_data26 # Qualitative check if max_possible_compression_ratio makes sense
2727 if max_possible_compression_ratio < 0.0 or max_possible_compression_ratio > 1.0:
28 def lzw_decompress(compressed):28 return 999.0
29 dict_size = 25629
30 dictionary = {i: chr(i) for i in range(dict_size)}30 # Verify compression is lossless (hypothetical check here)
31 31 # Normally, if we had a compression algorithm, we'd test decompress(compress(data)) == data
32 result = []32
33 w = chr(compressed.pop(0))33 # Returning the hypothetical compression performance
34 result.append(w)34 return max_possible_compression_ratio
35 35
36 for k in compressed:36
37 if k in dictionary:37
38 entry = dictionary[k]38
39 elif k == dict_size:39
40 entry = w + w[0]40
41 else:41
42 return None42
43 43
44 result.append(entry)44
45 45
46 dictionary[dict_size] = w + entry[0]46
47 dict_size += 147
48 48
49 w = entry49
50 50
51 return ''.join(result)51
5252
53 compressed_data = lzw_compress(data)53
54 decompressed_data = lzw_decompress(compressed_data)54
5555
56 if decompressed_data != data:56
57 return 999.057
5858
59 # Calculating the compression ratio59
60 compressed_size = len(compressed_data) * 2 # assuming each int takes 2 bytes60
61 original_size = len(data)61
6262
63 return 1.0 - (compressed_size / float(original_size))63
Your Solution
20% (0/5)438μs
1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
4 return 999.0
5
6 # Implementing basic Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) Compression Algorithm
7 def lzw_compress(uncompressed):
8 dict_size = 256
9 dictionary = {chr(i): i for i in range(dict_size)}
10
11 w = ""
12 compressed_data = []
13 for c in uncompressed:
14 wc = w + c
15 if wc in dictionary:
16 w = wc
17 else:
18 compressed_data.append(dictionary[w])
19 dictionary[wc] = dict_size
20 dict_size += 1
21 w = c
22
23 if w:
24 compressed_data.append(dictionary[w])
25
26 return compressed_data
27
28 def lzw_decompress(compressed):
29 dict_size = 256
30 dictionary = {i: chr(i) for i in range(dict_size)}
31
32 result = []
33 w = chr(compressed.pop(0))
34 result.append(w)
35
36 for k in compressed:
37 if k in dictionary:
38 entry = dictionary[k]
39 elif k == dict_size:
40 entry = w + w[0]
41 else:
42 return None
43
44 result.append(entry)
45
46 dictionary[dict_size] = w + entry[0]
47 dict_size += 1
48
49 w = entry
50
51 return ''.join(result)
52
53 compressed_data = lzw_compress(data)
54 decompressed_data = lzw_decompress(compressed_data)
55
56 if decompressed_data != data:
57 return 999.0
58
59 # Calculating the compression ratio
60 compressed_size = len(compressed_data) * 2 # assuming each int takes 2 bytes
61 original_size = len(data)
62
63 return 1.0 - (compressed_size / float(original_size))
Champion
97% (3/5)130μs
1def solve(input):
2 data = input.get("data", "")
3 if not isinstance(data, str) or not data:
4 return 999.0
5
6 # Mathematical/analytical approach: Entropy-based redundancy calculation
7
8 from collections import Counter
9 from math import log2
10
11 def entropy(s):
12 probabilities = [freq / len(s) for freq in Counter(s).values()]
13 return -sum(p * log2(p) if p > 0 else 0 for p in probabilities)
14
15 def redundancy(s):
16 max_entropy = log2(len(set(s))) if len(set(s)) > 1 else 0
17 actual_entropy = entropy(s)
18 return max_entropy - actual_entropy
19
20 # Calculate reduction in size possible based on redundancy
21 reduction_potential = redundancy(data)
22
23 # Assuming compression is achieved based on redundancy
24 max_possible_compression_ratio = 1.0 - (reduction_potential / log2(len(data)))
25
26 # Qualitative check if max_possible_compression_ratio makes sense
27 if max_possible_compression_ratio < 0.0 or max_possible_compression_ratio > 1.0:
28 return 999.0
29
30 # Verify compression is lossless (hypothetical check here)
31 # Normally, if we had a compression algorithm, we'd test decompress(compress(data)) == data
32
33 # Returning the hypothetical compression performance
34 return max_possible_compression_ratio